Next: 9.6 Comments on frictional
Up: 9.5 Biharmonic friction
Previous: 9.5.1 General formulation
9.5.2 Effects on kinetic energy
The manipulations necessary to show that the biharmonic friction
dissipates kinetic energy are analogous to those used for second order
friction in Section 9.4.8. As with that
discussion, the relevant contribution from horizontal biharmonic
friction is given by
.
Assuming
either no-slip or no-normal
stress at the boundaries brings
this expression to the form
For the product of traces, one has
The first term reduces to a boundary contribution, which will be
assumed to vanish. For the contraction of the two strain tensors,
one has
where the boundary term
was
assumed to vanish. Combining the two contributions leads to
which is non-positive.
If the viscosity B is distributed non-symmetrically, then the
effects on kinetics energy are guaranteed to be dissipative only for
the special case of constant viscosity. That is, in cartesian
coordinates, the operator
is dissipative for all B > 0,
whereas
or
can be
proven to be dissipative only for constant B. Until May 1999, this
point was not recognized when implementing the biharmonic friction
with non-constant viscosities in MOM.
Next: 9.6 Comments on frictional
Up: 9.5 Biharmonic friction
Previous: 9.5.1 General formulation
RC Pacanowski and SM Griffies, GFDL, Jan 2000