Next: 9.7 Functional formalism
Up: 9.6 Comments on frictional
Previous: 9.6.2 Conservation of angular
9.6.3 The advective and frictional metric terms
It is useful to provide a more mathematical statement concerning the
origin of the metric terms. For this purpose, consider the momemtum
equations for fluid motion on an arbitrary manifold
 |
= |
 |
(9.156) |
The acceleration of a fluid parcel takes the form
To reach this result, the conservation of mass on a curved manifold
has been used
 |
|
|
(9.158) |
As such, the time tendency for the momentum density is given by
 |
= |
 |
(9.159) |
This equation is written in the same form as the Cartesian equivalent
(9.143), except that now the derivatives
are covariant and so contain information about the generally curved
manifold. Expanding the covariant divergence using equation
(9.110) yields
 |
= |
![$\displaystyle (\sqrt{\mathcal{G}})^{-1} \,
[\sqrt{\mathcal{G}} \, (T^{mn} - \rh...
...)]_{,n}
+ (T^{ab} - \rho \, u^{a} \, u^{b}) \, \Gamma^{m}_{ab}
+ \rho \, f^{m}.$](s2img919.gif) |
(9.160) |
The Christoffel symbol
accounts for the spatial
dependence of the basis vectors. The
term is the ``frictional metric term'' and the
term is the ``advective metric term.''
Integration of a quantity over the volume of a finite grid cell in
arbitrary coordinates means performing an integral of the form
 |
= |
 |
(9.161) |
where
 |
|
|
(9.162) |
is the invariant volume element. For example, in spherical
coordinates
 |
|
|
(9.163) |
Hence, the metric terms cannot be written as the difference of fluxes
across grid cells faces, whereas the remaining terms can. For flat
space using Cartesian coordinates, the metric terms drop out, thus
recovering the results discussed in Section
9.6.1.
Next: 9.7 Functional formalism
Up: 9.6 Comments on frictional
Previous: 9.6.2 Conservation of angular
RC Pacanowski and SM Griffies, GFDL, Jan 2000