Next: 4.5 Flux form and
Up: 4.4 Comments on volume
Previous: 4.4.2 Mass conservation
4.4.3 Surface kinematic boundary conditions revisited
The discussion in Section 4.3.2
provided one method to derive the surface kinematic boundary
condition. This section provides another, which is based on the volume or mass
conserving balance equations for the layer thickness.
For a volume conserving fluid, the thickness equation
(4.40) can be written
 |
= |
 |
(4.49) |
To recover the surface boundary condition
(4.29), vertically integrate the
incompressibility condition (4.3),
,
to yield an expression for the vertical velocity at the bottom of
the surface layer
| w1 |
= |
 |
|
| |
= |
 |
(4.50) |
This expression in equation
(4.49) then yields the surface
kinematic boundary condition
 |
= |
 |
(4.51) |
For a mass conserving fluid, the thickness equation
(4.45) can be written
 |
= |
 |
(4.52) |
With the identity
 |
= |
 |
(4.53) |
the horizontal Langrangian derivative
can be completed to the full
Lagrangian derivative
 |
= |
 |
(4.54) |
The term on the right hand side under the integral vanishes due to mass
conservation
 |
= |
0. |
(4.55) |
As such, one recovers the surface kinematic boundary condition appropriate for a
mass conserving fluid
 |
= |
 |
(4.56) |
The quantity
 |
|
|
(4.57) |
is the volume flux in a mass conserving model. Thus, the only
apparent difference from the volume conserving kinematic condition
(4.29) is the approximation used for the
calculation of the volume flux through the sea surface. However,
other differences as thermal expansion are hidden in the vertical
velocity
.
Next: 4.5 Flux form and
Up: 4.4 Comments on volume
Previous: 4.4.2 Mass conservation
RC Pacanowski and SM Griffies, GFDL, Jan 2000