Next: 7. Free surface method
Up: 6. Rigid lid streamfunction
Previous: 6.7 Summary of the
6.8 Rigid lid surface pressure method
The rigid lid surface pressure method in MOM was developed by Smith,
Dukowicz, and Malone (1992) and Dukowicz, Smith, and Malone (1993). A
useful discussion of the analytical issues related to the surface
pressure formulation can be found in the paper by Pinardi, Rosati, and
Pacanowski (1995). The basic advantages over the streamfunction
approach are the following:
- 1.
- The elliptical operator has an H factor, rather than the
H-1 found in the streamfunction approach. This property makes
the elliptical operator more readily inverted than with the
streamfunction approach (see Section
6.4.3). In particular, steep
topography is much less of an issue with the surface pressure
approach.
- 2.
- The boundary conditions for the elliptical problem are Neumann
rather than Dirichlet. As discussed by Smith, Dukowicz, and Malone
(1992) and Dukowicz, Smith, and Malone (1993), Neumann boundary
conditions are much easier to handle on parallel machines than
Dirichlet conditions.
As the formulation of the rigid lid surface pressure method follows
quite closely the logic of the streamfunction approach, the details
are not reproduced here. Rather, reference should be made to the
Smith, Dukowicz, and Malone (1992), Dukowicz, Smith, and Malone (1993)
and Pinardi, Rosati, and Pacanowski (1995) papers.
Next: 7. Free surface method
Up: 6. Rigid lid streamfunction
Previous: 6.7 Summary of the
RC Pacanowski and SM Griffies, GFDL, Jan 2000