Next: 7.4.3 Revisiting the surface
Up: 7.4 Stresses at the
Previous: 7.4.1 Bottom stress
7.4.2 Surface stress
The stress
at the ocean surface arises from two terms
 |
= |
 |
(7.55) |
The first term is the usual wind stress contribution
.
Unless MOM is coupled to a wave model which
resolves the interactions between the sea surface and atmospheric
winds, the surface wind stress is unresolved and so must be
parameterized. As discussed in Section 4.3.3,
MOM assumes that this parameterization takes the same aerodynamic
form used for the bottom
 |
= |
 |
(7.56) |
where CD is a dimensionless drag coefficient and
is
the atmospheric density. This stress is formally identified with the
friction terms evaluated at the ocean surface
 |
|
|
(7.57) |
In the linearized free surface as well as the rigid lid, the
contribution from
,
which arises from the curvature of the free surface, is absent.
However, since the identification (7.57) is
formal in the sense that no rigorous microscopic treatment of these
friction terms is enabled in MOM, the differences are not important
in practice. The stress
is what MOM calls the
``surface momentum flux.''
In addition to the turbulent stress from the winds, fresh water
entrained in atmospheric winds introduces momentum into the free
surface ocean in the form given by equation (4.34)
 |
|
|
(7.58) |
where
is the density of the fresh water. Equivalently,
this stress can be thought of as the vertical advection of horizontal
momentum across the ocean surface. In this case it should be
proportional to the momentum of the fresh water outside the ocean. In
general, it might be appropriate to consider the presence of an
atmospheric model, a river model, or both, coupled to MOM. One may
then wish to evaluate this stress from the zonal wind velocity and
the zonal river current. Such detail, however, is not currently
incorporated into MOM (although see Section
8.5 for a preliminary river runoff model). As
a default, the simplest case
 |
= |
 |
(7.59) |
is assumed. In actuality, there is always some difference in the
wind speed and ocean current, and so some effective velocity may be
more appropriate. Some consideration to this fact is given in the
paper by Pacanowski (1987).
It is useful to further mention the importance of the stress from the
fresh water term, especially in seas with a high fresh water flux.
The implication of this term is that fresh water entrains also
momentum if it enters the ocean with a horizontal velocity, which
should be approximately the wind velocity. Thus, the above more
complete boundary condition is necessary for an overall momentum
conservation. An ocean with neither horizontal shear nor horizontal
pressure gradients can be used as a simple test case to see the
effect of the modified momentum flux boundary condition. It can be
checked easily that the total momentum is constant if water is added
at zero wind speed. If the wind speed is equal to the ocean surface
velocity, there acts the usual wind stress but additionally the total
momentum grows proportionally to the increasing surface height due to
the input of volume through the fresh water.
In summary, the complete free surface dynamic boundary condition
takes the form
 |
= |
 |
|
The left hand side is the vertical momentum flux in the ocean, and the
right hand side describes the vertical turbulent momentum flux in the
atmosphere-ocean boundary layer. Note that for the fresh water volume
flux the mass conserving form (see Section
4.4.3) has been used, although
MOM strictly conserves only volume.
Next: 7.4.3 Revisiting the surface
Up: 7.4 Stresses at the
Previous: 7.4.1 Bottom stress
RC Pacanowski and SM Griffies, GFDL, Jan 2000