Next: 35.1.8.7 Choosing the biharmonic
Up: 35.1.8 biharmonic_rm
Previous: 35.1.8.5 A note about
For linear stability, it is sufficient, and conservative, to consider
the numerical stability issues raised by Cox (1987) and
Griff ies et al. (1998) isoneutral
diffusion papers. In particular, one requires
For a conservative estimate of the stability, introduce the
dimensionless grid factor
 |
|
|
(35.61) |
where
is the minimum horizontal grid spacing over the
extent of the model domain, and
is the minimum vertical
spacing. Note that
should take into account the
convergence of the meridions. With this notation, the stability
constraint takes the form
| |Sx| |
 |
 |
(35.62) |
| |Sy| |
 |
 |
(35.63) |
As with the isoneutral diffusion scheme, these constraints place
limits on the maximum isoneutral slope that can be realized without
introducing some form of tapering to the biharmonic coefficient B.
When either component of the slope vector has a magnitude larger than
,
then the tapering of dm_taper (section
34.1.9.1) or gkw_taper (Section
34.1.9.2; the default) is employed.
An example is useful. Consider a typical mid-latitude channel model
with
 |
= |
 |
(35.64) |
 |
= |
10m |
(35.65) |
 |
= |
1000 secs |
(35.66) |
| B |
= |
1019 cm4/sec. |
(35.67) |
Linear stability says that tapering of the biharmonic coefficient
must occur when the slope is larger than
 |
|
|
(35.68) |
In the ocean, this is a rather steep slope, and so should not place a
serious constraint on the regions for which the biharmonic
dissipation acts with the full diffusivity. Note that the use of
B
= 1019 cm4/sec implies a dissipation time scale of grid sized
tracer anomalies (see Section
33.4 for details of how this
damping time is derived)
 |
|
|
(35.69) |
equal to 1day. Such a time scale corresponds to the time needed to
damp out a wave with wavenumber
,
which is the highest
wavenumber available to the grid.
Note that for most model grids, the huge maximum slope of 75/100 is
indistinguishable from the more modest 1/100 value commonly used
with redi_diffusion or gent_mcwilliams. The reason is
that the grid aspect ratio is typically on the order of 1/1000 in
the models. Therefore, the model grid essentially equates a slope
to an infinite slope. Hence, it makes little difference
whether one uses the same maximum slope for the biharmonic_rm
option as for the redi_diffusion or gent_mcwilliams
options, or if one allows the maximum slope for the biharmonic_rm option to be larger. For coding simplicity and
consistency between the different schemes, MOM uses the same
maximum slope slmx for all of the isoneutral mixing schemes.
Next: 35.1.8.7 Choosing the biharmonic
Up: 35.1.8 biharmonic_rm
Previous: 35.1.8.5 A note about
RC Pacanowski and SM Griffies, GFDL, Jan 2000