GFDL - Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

Heat stress reduces labor capacity under climate warming

February 24th, 2013

John P. Dunne, Ronald J. Stouffer, and Jasmin G. John. Journal: Nature Climate Change. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1827

Summary

The authors use existing occupational health and safety thresholds to establish a new metric to quantify a healthy, acclimated individual’s capacity to safely perform sustained labor under environmental heat stress (labor capacity). Using climate model projections, we apply this metric to quantify the direct impact of global warming on the global human population in the future.

Currently, peak months of heat stress reduce population-normalized labor capacity to about 90%. By mid-century, the labor capacity falls to about 80% during peak months. With global warming relative to pre-industrial conditions of 2°C (4°F), labor capacity is reduced to 74% in peak months. In a high emission scenario of 6.2°C (11°F) warming, the labor capacity is reduced to 39% in peak months. In this much warmer world, many areas would not be able to sustain human labor without environmental control during the warmest months of the year.

All organisms, including humans, have a temperature range over which they can environmentally adapt. Most studies of the direct impact of global warming on humans have focused on mortality under extreme weather events. Unfortunately, these efforts suffer from uncertainties in separating environmental stressors from other factors impacting mortality. This research establishes a new metric, labor capacity, using existing occupational thresholds. In this study, wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is used as a measure of combined thermal and humidity stress on human physiology and activity. The metric is of broad societal utility and quantifiable using WBGT, which is easily computed from climate model output. We estimate WBGT from both historical observational record (NCEP/NCAR reanalysis) and one of GFDL’s coupled carbon-climate Earth System Models (ESM2M). We bias-correct the model to present historical and projected maximum WBGT values under active mitigation (RCP4.5) and highest emissions (RCP8.5) out to 2200. This work represents a fundamental step forward in our ability to quantify the direct impact of climate warming on the global human population, finding that even under active mitigation of CO2 emissions, labor capacity reduction due to heat stress doubles by the middle of this century, with severe reduction of labor capacity due to environmental heat stress inferred under continued highest emissions out to 2200.

Figure: Population-weighted individual labor capacity (%) during annual minimum (upper lines) and maximum (lower lines) heat stress months. Shown are the historical period (NCEP reanalysis—black, maximum only; ESM2M historical—green), RCP4.5 (blue), and RCP8.5 (red) derived as in the inset (symbols for heavy, moderate and light labor threshold limit values - TLV) through a continuous representation (labor capacity = 100 - 25 x max(0,WBGT - 25)2/3 with an upper bound of 100; black line in inset).
Figure: Population-weighted individual labor capacity (%) during annual minimum (upper lines) and maximum (lower lines) heat stress months. Shown are the historical period (NCEP reanalysis—black, maximum only; ESM2M historical—green), RCP4.5 (blue), and RCP8.5 (red) derived as in the inset (symbols for heavy, moderate and light labor threshold limit values – TLV) through a continuous representation (labor capacity = 100 – 25 x max(0,WBGT – 25)2/3 with an upper bound of 100; black line in inset).
Top panel: Minimum monthly labor capacity (%) over the previous decade (2001-2010) from the NCEP climate reanalysis. Bottom panel: Minimum monthly labor capacity (%) in GFDL-ESM2M for 2091-2100 under the highest RCP emissions scenario which gives a global temperature anomaly of 3.4C relative to a 1861-1960 control period.
Top panel: Minimum monthly labor capacity (%) over the previous decade (2001-2010) from the NCEP climate reanalysis. Bottom panel: Minimum monthly labor capacity (%) in GFDL-ESM2M for 2091-2100 under the highest RCP emissions scenario which gives a global temperature anomaly of 3.4C relative to a 1861-1960 control period.

Known Uncertainties:

Uncertainties and caveats associated with these projections include climate sensitivity, CO2 emissions, ocean and atmospheric CO2 uptake, future population distributions, technological and societal change, representation of inter-annual variability of WBGT and its potential to change, and the relation of monthly average conditions to the diurnal cycle, weather and spatial patterns. In focusing on the capacity of healthy, acclimated individuals, this study also severely underestimates heat stress implications for less-optimally acclimated individuals such as the young, old, and sick.